Skip to content
Sam Bankman-Fried- Case Archive
evidenceevidencedocumentFederal Criminal TrialThe court's October 1 order addressing the possible relevance and prejudicial or confusing effect of evidence about counsel's involvementThe October 1 order addressed both the possible probative value of counsel's involvement and the risks of prejudice or confusion. During Day 6 argument, it was cited as requiring specificity about who was involved, what counsel knew or approved, and the relevant subject matter.
← All Evidence
Documents & Records

The court's October 1 order addressing the possible relevance and prejudicial or confusing effect of evidence about counsel's involvement

The October 1 order addressed both the possible probative value of counsel's involvement and the risks of prejudice or confusion. During Day 6 argument, it was cited as requiring specificity about who was involved, what counsel knew or approved, and the relevant subject matter.

1 proceeding1 mention1 trial

About

The government relied on the order when arguing that questioning about counsel's role in auto-deletion required a specific proffer identifying counsel's involvement, knowledge, approval, and a permissible purpose; the court took the issue under consideration.

Trial Record (1)

Federal Criminal Trial

Day 6