Documents & Records
The court's October 1 order addressing the possible relevance and prejudicial or confusing effect of evidence about counsel's involvement
The October 1 order addressed both the possible probative value of counsel's involvement and the risks of prejudice or confusion. During Day 6 argument, it was cited as requiring specificity about who was involved, what counsel knew or approved, and the relevant subject matter.
The court's October 1 order addressing the possible relevance and prejudicial or confusing effect of evidence about counsel's involvement
MentionedFederal Criminal Trial
About
The government relied on the order when arguing that questioning about counsel's role in auto-deletion required a specific proffer identifying counsel's involvement, knowledge, approval, and a permissible purpose; the court took the issue under consideration.