Skip to content
evidenceevidencedocumentFederal Criminal TrialGovernment Exhibit 221, 223, 224, 281, 282, 285-287, 290-293, and 302The emails and appointment records were received under an authenticity stipulation before being compared with the cell-site analysis. Busick said he reviewed the appointment documents after his initial analysis and compared local-time appointment windows with phone connections to assess whether the records were consistent with the phone being near specified locations.← All Evidence
Documents & Records

Government Exhibit 221, 223, 224, 281, 282, 285-287, 290-293, and 302

The emails and appointment records were received under an authenticity stipulation before being compared with the cell-site analysis. Busick said he reviewed the appointment documents after his initial analysis and compared local-time appointment windows with phone connections to assess whether the records were consistent with the phone being near specified locations.

Emails and appointment records compared with the cell-site analysis
1 mention

About

The documents supplied approximate phone-location evidence for times associated with meetings and communications in Manhattan, without establishing the phone's exact position.

Mentions (1)

FederalFederal Criminal TrialOct 3, 2023 – Nov 2, 2023