Skip to content
Federal Criminal Trialtrial-daytrial-dayThane RehnNicolas RoosDanielle R. SassoonChristian R. EverdellDavid F. LisnerKungyu Matthew HuangGary WangAdam YedidiadirectcrossredirectDay 3 - October 5, 2023Adam Yedidia testified about customer deposits routed through an Alameda-controlled account, an approximately $8 billion liability after a bug fix, deleted Signal messages, and why later information prompted his resignation. Matthew Huang described Paradigm’s diligence, while Gary Wang admitted fraud and testified that FTX code gave Alameda exceptional access to customer funds.
← Day 2Federal Criminal TrialDay 4 →

Day 3 - October 5, 2023

Yedidia on Customer Funds, Paradigm’s Diligence, and Wang on Alameda Privileges

Judge Lewis A. Kaplan
6Proceedings
3Pages
3Witnesses
3,089Lines
1Sidebars
Day 3 of 19
Appearing:

Adam Yedidia testified about customer deposits routed through an Alameda-controlled account, an approximately $8 billion liability after a bug fix, deleted Signal messages, and why later information prompted his resignation. Matthew Huang described Paradigm’s diligence, while Gary Wang admitted fraud and testified that FTX code gave Alameda exceptional access to customer funds.

Full day summary

Adam Yedidia testified that FTX customers sent fiat deposits to the Alameda-controlled North Dimension account and that, as far as he knew, customers were not told of Alameda’s control. He said an internal account tracked Alameda’s liability for those deposits and that, after he corrected a code bug, the balance showed approximately $8 billion owed to FTX customers in June 2022. Yedidia testified that he told Bankman-Fried the corrected amount, transmitted his analysis through Signal, and later found that the transmitting message had been automatically deleted while the underlying document survived. He also described Bankman-Fried as atypically worried or nervous when saying FTX and Alameda were no longer “bulletproof.” On cross-examination, Yedidia acknowledged introducing the bug, described the limits of his financial knowledge, and discussed his immunity orders and meetings with prosecutors. He clarified that his resignation followed secondhand information about what Caroline Ellison reportedly said at an Alameda meeting. On redirect, he distinguished knowing about the approximately $8 billion liability from later learning that customer money had been used to repay loans, which he understood to mean the money was gone. The court struck his broad statement that FTX had defrauded customers. Paradigm co-founder Kungyu Matthew Huang testified that the investment firm raised governance concerns and asked whether Alameda received preferential treatment, recalling assurances that it did not and that FTX and Alameda would become less linked. He said Paradigm was not told that Alameda could avoid ordinary liquidation rules, maintain a negative balance, or access other customers’ deposits. Paradigm invested about $278 million in FTX and FTX.US and later marked the investment to zero. On cross-examination, Huang said Paradigm was generally satisfied with management’s answers before investing and knew that FTX lacked a board. The court limited questioning suggesting investor gullibility or negligence and rejected the defense’s characterization of Huang as an undisclosed expert. Gary Wang admitted committing fraud with Bankman-Fried, Nishad Singh, and Caroline Ellison and testified under a cooperation agreement. He said FTX code gave Alameda undisclosed privileges to maintain negative balances, withdraw without ordinary limits, and use a $65 billion line of credit. Wang testified that Alameda had withdrawn $8 billion by FTX’s bankruptcy, leaving FTX unable to repay customers seeking withdrawals. He said he implemented or used implementations of special features at Bankman-Fried’s direction and described Bankman-Fried as FTX’s final decision-maker when the co-founders disagreed.

1. Adam Yedidia — Direct/Cross/Redirect (Part 2)

Adam Yedidia's direct, cross, and redirect testimony spans Day 3, focusing on Alameda's approximately $8 billion debt to FTX customers, the fiat-account bug, Signal message deletion, and why he resigned in November 2022.

Direct
Adam Yedidia — Direct Adam Yedidia Danielle R. Sassoon
888 lines

Adam Yedidia explained how Alameda received and tracked FTX customer fiat deposits, testified that a corrected code bug revealed an approximately $8 billion liability, and described Bankman-Fried's knowledge, Signal auto-deletion policy, and response to concerns about the debt.

Cross
Adam Yedidia — Cross Adam Yedidia Christian R. Everdell
1165 lines

Yedidia's cross-examination explored his limited financial role, FTX's controls and growth, his immunity and government preparation, the fiat-account bug, the approximately $8 billion liability remaining after correction, and the secondhand information that prompted his resignation.

Redirect
Adam Yedidia — Redirect Adam Yedidia Danielle R. Sassoon
129 lines

Yedidia distinguished knowing about Alameda's $8 billion liability from knowing customer funds had been spent, explained his "not bulletproof" interpretation and resignation, and addressed FTX spending, luxury housing, compensation, and the limits of his pre-November knowledge.

Highlights

Adam Yedidia — Directtestimony highlightYedidia explained that FTX customers were directed to send fiat deposits to the Alameda-controlled North Dimension account and that, as far as he knew, FTX did not disclose Alameda's control of the account to customers.Adam Yedidia — Direct“The negative value of the fiat@ftx.com account effectively represented the liability Alameda owed to FTX's customers.”— Adam YedidiaYedidia summarized the accounting mechanism at the center of his testimony about customer fiat deposits.Adam Yedidia — Directtestimony highlightYedidia described a code bug that overstated the liability, said he corrected an approximately $16 billion balance to approximately $8 billion, and testified that he told Bankman-Fried the corrected amount.Adam Yedidia — Directevidence eventYedidia testified that Bankman-Fried instructed employees to use Signal with automatic deletion and explained that the Signal message carrying Yedidia's analysis was deleted while the underlying document remained.Adam Yedidia — CrossimpeachmentCross-examination established that Yedidia asserted his Fifth Amendment right, received immunity orders, met repeatedly with prosecutors, and remained subject to prosecution if he lied.Adam Yedidia — Redirecttestimony highlightYedidia explained that he did not resign upon learning of Alameda's $8 billion liability because he thought customers could still be repaid. He distinguished that knowledge from learning that customer money had been spent and said using customer funds to repay loans implied the money was gone.Adam Yedidia — Redirect“Because if Alameda was repaying its loans with FTX customer money, that implied that it didn't have money of its own to repay the loans with, which means the money was simply gone.”— Adam YedidiaYedidia explained why the information he received in November 2022 changed his understanding and prompted his resignation.

2. Kungyu Matthew Huang — Direct/Cross

Kungyu Matthew Huang's Day 3 testimony moved from the prosecution's account of Paradigm's FTX due diligence and undisclosed Alameda privileges to defense questioning about Paradigm's investment process and known governance concerns.

Direct
Kungyu Matthew Huang — Direct Kungyu Matthew Huang Thane Rehn
334 lines

Paradigm co-founder Kungyu Matthew Huang testified about FTX's investor representations, undisclosed risks involving Alameda and customer deposits, the financial information Paradigm reviewed, and an investment totaling about $278 million that Paradigm later marked to zero.

Cross
Kungyu Matthew Huang — Cross Kungyu Matthew Huang David F. Lisner
162 lines

Defense counsel tested Paradigm's diligence and known concerns about FTX's lack of a board, while the court limited investor-gullibility questioning and rejected the defense's characterization of Huang as an effective expert.

1 sidebar inside this proceeding
  1. Cross-Examination of Exchange TestimonyDefense counsel discussed the permissible scope of cross-examining a witness about exchanges and markets after characterizing portions of his direct testimony as lay expert testimony.

Highlights

3. Gary Wang — Direct (Part 1)

Gary Wang's Day 3 direct examination addressed Alameda's undisclosed privileges in FTX's code, Bankman-Fried's authority, and Wang's guilty plea and cooperation agreement.

Direct
Gary Wang — Direct Gary Wang Nicolas Roos
411 lines

Gary Wang admitted participating in financial crimes and testified that Bankman-Fried directed undisclosed FTX code privileges allowing Alameda to withdraw customer assets into an $8 billion deficit and use a $65 billion line of credit.

Highlights

← Day 2Federal Criminal TrialDay 4 →