Skip to content
personpersonChristian R. EverdellChristian R. EverdellTrial counsel who represented Samuel Bankman-Fried in his 2023 federal criminal case.← All People
DefenseCohen & Gresser, LLP

Christian R. Everdell

Trial counsel who represented Samuel Bankman-Fried in his 2023 federal criminal case.

2,332 lines·41 proceedings

About

Christian R. Everdell handled a wide range of defense examinations. He questioned Adam Yedidia about his immunity, limited financial role, and the approximately $8 billion liability left after correction of a fiat-account bug. With Gary Wang, he tested operational explanations for Alameda's special FTX account features, customer-fiat and stablecoin mechanics, balance calculations, and cooperation incentives. Wang maintained that the privileges were unusually large and that Alameda had used customer assets.

Everdell then pressed the limits of technical and documentary witnesses. Christian Drappi had limited knowledge of Bankman-Fried's computer use; cell-site analyst Richard Busick could not identify a phone's user or reveal call content; and Google custodian Cory Gaddis had limited experience interpreting technical metadata. Shamel Medrano acknowledged that prosecutors selected the messages he reviewed and that he lacked their full context. Paige Owens said fund-tracing results depended on the chosen accounting method and that she had not traced the origin of funds entering Alameda or North Dimension accounts. Everdell also tested the preparation and source limits of a Signal-group summary chart through Marc Troiano.

During the defense case, Everdell examined Krystal Rolle about Bahamian orders directing FTX Digital Markets asset transfers and Bankman-Fried's interactions with regulators and police. Rolle had no firsthand knowledge of FTX customer-fund spending. He also examined defense consultant Joseph Pimbley about database extracts used to chart Alameda's credit line and selected account balances. On cross-examination, Pimbley acknowledged that the charts did not address intent, trace customer assets, or measure the customer shortfall.

Beyond witness examinations, Everdell argued about how the jury could use employee disclosures and messages sent after FTX's collapse. He contended that disclosures at an all-hands meeting cut against the government's claim that the statements furthered a conspiracy, and that later messages did not reliably show Bankman-Fried's earlier state of mind and risked unfair prejudice. The court allowed the defense to play one additional clip from the all-hands meeting and overruled the objections to the later messages.

Trial Record (41)

FederalFederal Criminal TrialOct 3, 2023 – Nov 2, 2023

Christian R. Everdell cross-examined prosecution witnesses about Alameda's special FTX privileges, their cooperation incentives, and limits in digital, location, messaging, and fund-tracing evidence. For the defense, he examined witnesses on Bahamian asset-transfer orders and FTX database balances.

Day 2

Day 3

Day 4

Day 5

Day 7

ProceduralEvidentiary Hearing on All-Hands Meeting Clips1highlight31lines spoken

Summary

The court allowed six government all-hands meeting clips at least as prior consistent statements, rejected defense clip 415A-T, and allowed defense clip 415B-T to follow them.

Highlights (1)

Quoteβ€œIf all they want to do in furtherance of the conspiracy, to further the conspiracy, is to try to keep employees there and working so that maybe the company can survive if the Binance deal goes through, the last thing you are going to do is start divulging things about who knew what and when about the crime that you allegedly committed.”— Christian R. EverdellThe defense argued that disclosures to employees were inconsistent with the government's theory that the statements furthered a conspiracy.Open in transcript →

Day 8

Day 10

Day 11

ProceduralStipulation and Exhibit-Admissibility Hearing1highlight26lines spoken

Summary

After hearing relevance, Rule 403, and hearsay objections to Twitter-message exhibits, the court overruled the defense objections and admonished both sides to communicate better about metadata stipulations.

Highlights (1)

Quoteβ€œThis is an after-the-fact statement maybe about his mental state on November 16, but it's not probative of his mental state prior to November 16 and it could be taken out of context, and the jury could use it inappropriately against my client.”— Christian R. EverdellThe defense's central argument was that the post-conspiracy messages did not reliably establish Mr. Bankman-Fried's earlier state of mind and could be misused by the jury.Open in transcript →

Day 14

DirectJoseph Pimbley β€” DirectJoseph PimbleyChristian R. Everdell131lines spoken

Summary

Defense consultant Joseph Pimbley presented FTX database charts showing a sharp mid-June 2022 decline in Alameda's recorded credit use and November balances of about $5.8 billion in four selected currencies and $8.9 billion across all currencies, excluding Alameda and FTX entities. In the four-currency chart, 78 percent fell in the category combining spot-margin, spot-margin-lending, or futures-activity accounts. His work was limited to extracting and validating these figures.

Day 16

Day 17

Day 19