Christian R. Everdell cross-examined prosecution witnesses about Alameda's special FTX privileges, their cooperation incentives, and limits in digital, location, messaging, and fund-tracing evidence. For the defense, he examined witnesses on Bahamian asset-transfer orders and FTX database balances.
Christian R. Everdell
Trial counsel who represented Samuel Bankman-Fried in his 2023 federal criminal case.
About
Christian R. Everdell handled a wide range of defense examinations. He questioned Adam Yedidia about his immunity, limited financial role, and the approximately $8 billion liability left after correction of a fiat-account bug. With Gary Wang, he tested operational explanations for Alameda's special FTX account features, customer-fiat and stablecoin mechanics, balance calculations, and cooperation incentives. Wang maintained that the privileges were unusually large and that Alameda had used customer assets.
Everdell then pressed the limits of technical and documentary witnesses. Christian Drappi had limited knowledge of Bankman-Fried's computer use; cell-site analyst Richard Busick could not identify a phone's user or reveal call content; and Google custodian Cory Gaddis had limited experience interpreting technical metadata. Shamel Medrano acknowledged that prosecutors selected the messages he reviewed and that he lacked their full context. Paige Owens said fund-tracing results depended on the chosen accounting method and that she had not traced the origin of funds entering Alameda or North Dimension accounts. Everdell also tested the preparation and source limits of a Signal-group summary chart through Marc Troiano.
During the defense case, Everdell examined Krystal Rolle about Bahamian orders directing FTX Digital Markets asset transfers and Bankman-Fried's interactions with regulators and police. Rolle had no firsthand knowledge of FTX customer-fund spending. He also examined defense consultant Joseph Pimbley about database extracts used to chart Alameda's credit line and selected account balances. On cross-examination, Pimbley acknowledged that the charts did not address intent, trace customer assets, or measure the customer shortfall.
Beyond witness examinations, Everdell argued about how the jury could use employee disclosures and messages sent after FTX's collapse. He contended that disclosures at an all-hands meeting cut against the government's claim that the statements furthered a conspiracy, and that later messages did not reliably show Bankman-Fried's earlier state of mind and risked unfair prejudice. The court allowed the defense to play one additional clip from the all-hands meeting and overruled the objections to the later messages.
Trial Record (41)
No proceedings match this filter.