Skip to content
personpersonShamel MedranoShamel MedranoInvestigative analyst with the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York.← All People
WitnessUnited States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York

Shamel Medrano

Investigative analyst with the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York.

127 lines·3 proceedings·1 mention

About

Shamel Medrano testified for the government on Day 11 about his limited work on the case as an investigative analyst. He said that he loaded Twitter search-warrant returns and created maps.

On direct examination, Medrano explained features of Twitter records and identified information in social-media and business documents, including dates, account details, document types, signatures, and people shown in the records. His testimony also addressed stipulated exhibits concerning a deleted tweet and private messages about ethics, public relations, regulators, company personnel, and customer deposits.

On cross-examination, Medrano acknowledged that prosecutors supplied the communications and that he did not select them. He also lacked firsthand knowledge about whether additional messages existed, the participants' relationships, and the communications' broader context. The court sustained the prosecution's objection when the defense asked whether he could determine the tone of a conversation.

Trial Record (3)

FederalFederal Criminal TrialOct 3, 2023 – Nov 2, 2023Called by prosecution

Shamel Medrano testified for the government about social-media and business records after loading Twitter search-warrant returns and creating maps. Cross-examination focused on his lack of firsthand knowledge about the selection, completeness, and context of the communications.

Day 11

DirectShamel Medrano β€” DirectShamel MedranoDanielle R. Sassoon2highlights104lines spoken

Summary

Investigative analyst Shamel Medrano explained Twitter records and presented stipulated posts, direct messages, corporate documents, and deletion information tied to FTX, Alameda-affiliated entities, public representations, and private November 2022 communications.

Highlights (2)

testimony highlightMedrano described his investigative-analyst duties and limited his work in this case to loading Twitter search-warrant returns into an investigative database and creating maps.Open in transcript →
Quoteβ€œInitially, I loaded some Twitter search warrant returns into one of our investigative databases, and I also created some maps. Other than that, nothing else.”— Shamel MedranoMedrano expressly limited his involvement in the investigation, defining him as a records-presentation witness rather than a witness to the underlying business events.Open in transcript →
CrossShamel Medrano β€” CrossShamel MedranoChristian R. Everdell5highlights23lines spoken

Summary

Medrano acknowledged that prosecutors selected the Twitter messages he reviewed and that he lacked personal knowledge of their completeness, participants, relationships, and surrounding context.

Highlights (5)

admissionMedrano confirmed that prosecutors supplied the messages, that he did not select them, and that he did not know whether other messages involving the same people existed.Open in transcript →
Quoteβ€œYes, the prosecutors showed me the messages.”— Shamel MedranoMedrano confirmed that the prosecution, rather than he, selected the communications he reviewed for testimony.Open in transcript →
testimony highlightMedrano acknowledged that he did not know the message participants, their relationships with Mr. Bankman-Fried, or the events preceding the conversations; he knew only what he saw in the selected material.Open in transcript →
Quoteβ€œNo. I only know what I was seeing, correct.”— Shamel MedranoThe answer captured Medrano's limited knowledge of the circumstances surrounding the selected messages.Open in transcript →
Show all 5 highlights
rulingThe court sustained the prosecution's objection when the defense asked whether Medrano could determine the conversation's tone from the messages.Open in transcript →