Skip to content
personpersonSamuel Bankman-FriedSamuel Bankman-FriedFounder of Alameda Research and co-founder and former chief executive officer of FTX, and the defendant in this federal criminal case.← All People
DefendantFTX and Alameda Research

Samuel Bankman-Fried

Founder of Alameda Research and co-founder and former chief executive officer of FTX, and the defendant in this federal criminal case.

3,065 lines·58 proceedings·43 mentions

About

Samuel Bankman-Fried stood trial over the collapse of FTX and Alameda Research. The prosecution alleged that he gave Alameda undisclosed access to FTX customer assets, concealed the resulting multibillion-dollar shortfall, and misled customers, investors, and lenders. His defense maintained that the businesses were legitimate, Alameda's borrowing was permitted, and weak controls, market shocks, and a liquidity crisis did not prove fraudulent intent.

Former colleagues supplied much of the prosecution's account. Gary Wang testified that undisclosed code privileges let Alameda withdraw customer assets and use an exceptional credit line. Caroline Ellison testified that Alameda repaid recalled loans with customer money and hid its borrowing in lender balance sheets. Nishad Singh described Alameda's special account treatment, the customer-fund shortfall, and public assurances during the November crisis. Each acknowledged his or her own criminal conduct; the defense challenged the cooperating witnesses and argued that business failures were being treated as fraud.

Bankman-Fried first testified at a Day 14 admissibility hearing and then before the jury on Days 15 through 17. He described Alameda as a payment agent for customer deposits, said FTX's terms allowed margin borrowing, and maintained that Alameda had positive net asset value despite a multibillion-dollar liability. He acknowledged an approximately $8 billion fiat-related liability and a later discussion of a liability above $10 billion, while describing the November withdrawals as a liquidity crisis. On cross-examination, prosecutors compared those claims with public assurances, private messages, account settings, and financial records. He acknowledged Alameda's unusually large credit line and altered liquidation treatment, but disputed the government's interpretation and denied fraudulent intent. On redirect, he acknowledged major shortcomings in risk management and his oversight of the payment-agent relationship.

The jury found him guilty on all seven counts on Day 19: two wire-fraud counts, two wire-fraud conspiracies, and conspiracies to commit securities fraud, commodities fraud, and money laundering. Each juror confirmed the verdict when polled.

Trial Record (58)

FederalFederal Criminal TrialOct 3, 2023 – Nov 2, 2023Called by defense

Samuel Bankman-Fried defended fraud and conspiracy charges involving FTX customer assets and Alameda Research. He testified that the disputed borrowing was permitted and the collapse reflected business and risk-management failures; prosecutors challenged that account with witness testimony and records. The jury found him guilty on all seven counts.

Day 2

OpeningGovernment Opening StatementThane Rehn1highlightMentioned

Summary

The prosecution alleged that Sam Bankman-Fried diverted FTX customer assets through Alameda, concealed the resulting shortfall, and misled customers, investors, and lenders.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (1)

otherThe prosecution introduced its central allegation that Sam Bankman-Fried used FTX to take billions of dollars from customers while publicly presenting the company as safe and trustworthy.Open in transcript →
OpeningDefense Opening StatementMark S. Cohen1highlightMentioned

Summary

The defense argued that Mr. Bankman-Fried acted in good faith and that rapid growth, weak controls, market shocks, and a liquidity crisis—not fraud—caused FTX's collapse.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (1)

otherThe defense presented its central theory that Mr. Bankman-Fried acted in good faith, believed FTX's loans to Alameda were permitted and adequately secured, and did not intend to defraud anyone.Open in transcript →
ProceduralMedication Access RequestMentioned

Summary

Defense counsel raised missed Adderall doses and their asserted effect on Mr. Bankman-Fried's focus; the court directed counsel to contact the Bureau of Prisons and confirmed an existing early-production order.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 3

Day 5

Day 6

Day 7

Day 8

ProceduralRobing Room Medication DiscussionMentioned

Summary

Defense counsel raised concerns that Bankman-Fried lacked effective Adderall coverage during trial hours. The prosecution relayed a planned extended-release BOP arrangement, and the court required a Monday status report.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectZac Prince — DirectZac PrinceNicolas RoosMentioned

Summary

Zac Prince described BlockFi's due diligence and reliance on Alameda's financial statements, explained why it extended hundreds of millions of dollars in new loans, and testified that approximately $1 billion in combined Alameda and FTX exposure was not returned.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 9

DirectTareq Morad — DirectTareq MoradSamuel RaymondMentioned

Summary

Tareq Morad traced roughly $500,000 in FTX funding through North Dimension, described his expectations that deposits remained under his control, and testified that he relied on a withdrawal assurance before an unsuccessful attempt to recover a documented $257,948.53 balance.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 10

Day 11

DirectPaige Owens — DirectPaige OwensThane RehnMentioned

Summary

FBI forensic accountant Paige Owens explained government-prepared charts tracing funds from Alameda Research, FTX Digital Markets, and North Dimension accounts through accounts associated with Samuel Bankman-Fried, Nishad Singh, and Ryan Salame to political contributions.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 12

Day 14

CrossMarc Troiano — CrossMarc TroianoChristian R. EverdellMentioned

Summary

Defense counsel tested the prosecution's role in preparing the Signal summary chart and Troiano's limited knowledge. After striking a misleading question and answer, the court restricted repetitive or out-of-scope questioning, while Troiano confirmed three entries attributed to SBF turning off auto-delete and a one-week setting for the “KYC/legal discuss” group.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

CrossJoseph Pimbley — CrossJoseph PimbleyThane RehnMentioned

Summary

Pimbley acknowledged that his defense charts were limited database extractions that did not address intent, asset tracing, customer shortfalls, or the significance of counsel-selected account categories; the court then began Bankman-Fried's admissibility hearing outside the jury's presence.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

ProceduralAdvice-of-Counsel Evidentiary HearingMentioned

Summary

The defense sought to present lawyer-consultation and industry-practice evidence without asserting a formal advice-of-counsel defense; the government challenged its relevance, and the court reserved its rulings while flagging a possible instruction about a denied subpoena.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 15

ProceduralAdvice-of-Counsel Ruling and Morning MattersMentioned

Summary

The court allowed limited evidence that FTX counsel helped prepare a data-retention policy, excluded four other lawyer-drafted-document items, and refused to categorically bar use of Bankman-Fried's prior hearing testimony.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 16

DirectSamuel Bankman-Fried — Direct ResumedSamuel Bankman-FriedMark S. Cohen4highlights197lines spoken

Summary

Bankman-Fried described his October assessment of Alameda's liability and solvency, defended FTX's public assurances, and traced the withdrawal surge and asset crash. He said FTX faced a liquidity crisis and Alameda remained barely solvent while risking a solvency crisis.

Highlights (4)

evidence eventDefendant's Exhibit 5 was admitted and published. Bankman-Fried used the October 2022 priority list to describe projects involving exchange capacity, fraud-risk scoring, databases, and accounting, and said he then believed the projects together could roughly double annual revenue from $1 billion to $2 billion.Open in transcript →
testimony highlightBankman-Fried described an October database query that revealed an approximately $8 billion fiat-related liability. He said he concluded it was already reflected in Alameda's financials, placed Alameda's total FTX liability around $10 billion, and still viewed Alameda as having roughly $10 billion in positive net asset value.Open in transcript →
testimony highlightUsing several admitted tweets, Bankman-Fried traced the CoinDesk article, Changpeng Zhao's announcement that Binance would sell its remaining FTT, Alameda's response offer, and FTX's withdrawal updates. He testified that net withdrawals rose from approximately $1 billion on November 6 to approximately $4 billion on November 7.Open in transcript →
evidence eventBankman-Fried testified that an asset-price crash reduced Alameda's net asset value from nearly $10 billion to slightly above zero and that its broad-market hedges provided no benefit. He said he removed his 'FTX is fine' tweet, began liquidating Alameda, and contacted potential investors; a stipulation supplied the tweet's deletion date.Open in transcript →

Day 17

Day 18

Day 19

VerdictVerdict ProceedingsMentioned

Summary

The jury found Samuel Bankman-Fried guilty on all seven counts, confirmed both submitted money-laundering theories, and unanimously affirmed the verdict when polled.

Mentioned in this proceeding.